Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42232469›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference2026

Interrogating the "Us" Versus "Them" Dichotomy in Technology Research with Older Adults.

Amanda Lazar, Elissa Carpio, Ruipu Hu, Beth Barnett, Kibron Tesfatsion, Sheena Erete

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amanda LazarCollege of Information, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Elissa CarpioCollege of Information, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Ruipu HuCollege of Information, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Beth BarnettCollege of Information, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Kibron TesfatsionCollege of Information, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Sheena EreteCollege of Information Studies, University of Maryland College Park, College Park, Maryland, USA.

Funding

ACL HHS 90REGE0024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research on technology for older people focuses on older people's experiences-and understandably so. However, the phenomena of othering, or seeing this group as different and worse off, is a persistent problem. In this project, we turned inwards through an 8-month collaborative autoethnography to understand our own experiences with technology issues and supporting others in technology use. We found that each member of our mixed age group faced pervasive and burdensome technology issues and recognized that some of the burden is associated with the evolution of technology tools. Our work contributes an expanded understanding of aging as a sociotechnical process and identifies counternarratives to implicit assumptions we held as HCI researchers working with older people. Our research also shows how reflexive positional methods can surface often unexamined experiences with technology issues and aging among researchers.

Indexed as

AgingAutoethnographyOlder adultsOtheringTechnology trendsUs vs Them

Identifiers

PMID42232469
PMCPMC13225188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.