ArticleSurgical neurology international2026
The role of ambulatory surgical centers in current neurosurgical practice.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The recent focus on improving quality and reducing cost within the US healthcare system has increased care being performed in the outpatient setting. The impact on neurosurgeons' practice patterns has not yet been fully elucidated. In addition, how this transition may affect neurosurgery resident training is unclear. To better understand these issues, we surveyed neurosurgeons. Methods: A 13-question survey was sent to Council of State Neurosurgical Societies email subscribers. The survey focused on training or practice level, location, practice setting, ambulatory surgical center (ASC) utilization, and types of procedures performed at ASCs. Responses were tabulated. Statistical analysis was performed. Results: Among 11,091 subscribers, 101 responses (0.9%) were recorded. Most of the respondents (57.4%) utilized an ASC in their practice. The commonly performed procedures were microdiscectomy (98.1%), hemilaminectomy (94.2%), battery changes (87.5%), single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (84.6%), single-level lumbar or thoracic laminectomy (80.8%), and peripheral nerve decompression (66.7%). Cranial procedures were seldom performed. Other device-related procedures were common and included vagal nerve stimulation (32.5%), spinal cord stimulation (67.5%), baclofen pump placement (25%), and baclofen pump replacement (27.5%). Only 17.1% of respondents who worked in academia taught residents in an ASC. Conclusion: According to our survey results, most neurosurgeons have incorporated ASCs into their practices in some capacity and most frequently for simple spine procedures, device-related procedures, and peripheral nerve decompression. The limited resident involvement in procedures in the ASC setting, even among attending academic neurosurgeons, suggests an increased need for ASC incorporation in residency training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.