Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42232432›Full record

ReviewSurgical neurology international2026

Autologous bone flap salvage strategies in postcraniotomy surgical site infections: A scoping review.

Tejas Arvind Sardar, Robert Dunwoody, Jeffrey Klopfenstein

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Surgical neurology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tejas Arvind SardarDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Peoria, Illinois, United States.
Robert DunwoodyDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Peoria, Illinois, United States.
Jeffrey KlopfensteinDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Peoria, Illinois, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This scoping review sought to examine the available evidence on bone flap preservation techniques following postcraniotomy surgical site infection (SSI) when simultaneously reimplanted at the time of debridement. Methods: A broad search of PubMed and Embase databases was conducted using relevant search terms. Records were filtered, screened, and assessed for eligibility for further analysis by two reviewers. Data, including study characteristics, demographic and intervention details, and success rates, were extracted. Results: Initial broad searches yielded 1,513 records. Of these, 8 studies, including 2 case reports, 1 prospective, and 5 retrospective case series, were selected for inclusion. The pooled sample consisted of 92 patients, both adults and children, with a mean age of 44.4 years, of whom 55.4% were male. The average reported time to follow-up was 21.4 months. All studies reported patient intervention that included surgical debridement, antibiotic therapy, and intraoperative bone flap sterilization. A novel "wash in, wash out" technique involving postoperative Conclusion: Bone flap preservation at the time of wound debridement combined with antibiotic therapy in postcraniotomy SSI demonstrates high success rates. However, evidence is limited and low quality. Consensus guidelines are needed but will require comparative prospective trials to determine optimal treatment mechanisms, duration and choice of antibiotics, longer-term outcomes, and cost-benefit differences.

Indexed as

Brain abscessCraniotomyDebridementSubdural empyemaSurgical wound infection

Identifiers

PMID42232432
PMCPMC13224182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.