ArticleSurgical neurology international2026
Eosinophil-rich sterile fluid collection after calcium phosphate cement use in cranial reconstruction: A case suggesting implant-associated inflammatory reaction.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Calcium phosphate cement (CPC) is widely used in cranial reconstruction; however, postoperative fluid collection occasionally occurs, and its biological characteristics remain poorly understood. Case Description: A 70-year-old woman underwent microsurgical clipping of an unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysm. CPC was applied during cranial reconstruction. Early postoperative imaging showed subcutaneous fluid accumulation, which became clinically evident by postoperative day 4 and increased until day 17. Aspiration yielded clear, culture-negative fluid. Cytological analysis revealed lymphocyte-predominant inflammation with a notable eosinophilic component and granuloma-like CD68-positive histiocytic aggregates surrounding amorphous material. No clinical or radiological findings suggested infection or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage. The collection resolved after a single aspiration without recurrence. Conclusion: Eosinophil-rich, culture-negative fluid collection after CPC use may represent a self-limited implant-associated inflammatory reaction. Recognition of this pattern may support conservative management when infection and CSF leakage are unlikely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.