ReviewSurgical neurology international2026
Internal carotid artery agenesis: A narrative review.
Review in Surgical neurology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Congenital anomalies of the internal carotid artery (ICA), including hypoplasia, aplasia, and agenesis, are rare vascular conditions with a prevalence below 0.01%. Most patients remain asymptomatic because of collateral cerebral circulation, yet these anomalies may cause cerebrovascular complications, particularly ischemic events and intracranial aneurysm formation. Methods: A narrative literature review was performed to synthesize available data on demographics, embryology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, imaging evaluation, classification systems, management, and outcomes of congenital ICA anomalies. Results: ICA agenesis is commonly detected incidentally, especially in unilateral cases with adequate collateral pathways. Symptomatic cases, more frequent in bilateral involvement, may present with headache, transient ischemic attack, stroke, or impaired consciousness. Risk factors include bilateral absence, incomplete collateral circulation, and classification patterns such as Lie types C and D and Jamous type 1b, associated with increased hemodynamic stress and aneurysm formation. Computed tomography (CT) angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, and digital subtraction angiography are central to diagnosis, whereas skull base CT distinguishes agenesis from hypoplasia. Management is usually conservative in asymptomatic patients, whereas surgical or endovascular treatment is reserved for aneurysms or hemodynamic compromise. Conclusion: ICA agenesis is a rare but clinically important anomaly. Recognition of variants, imaging features, and complications is essential for diagnosis and procedural planning. Surveillance imaging and individualized management help reduce cerebrovascular morbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.