Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42232378›Full record

ReviewJournal of family & community medicine

A review of the global feasibility of medical malpractice insurance: Legal frameworks, economic viability, implementation challenges, and impact on patient safety.

Afnan Aljaffary

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of family & community medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Afnan AljaffaryDepartment of Health Information Management and Technology, College of Public Health, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical malpractice insurance (MMI) is a critical determinant of healthcare quality, health partitioners' behavior, and health system sustainability in many countries. Despite decades of global efforts to reform MMI, evidence of the structure, awareness, implementation, and the impact of its framework remains fragmented. The aim of this review was to synthesize the global literature to map current evidence on the MMI legal framework, its economic viability, barriers to its implementation, and the implications for healthcare delivery and patient safety. A narrative review, informed by a systematic search, was conducted according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses) 2020 guidelines. Fourteen studies published between 2004 and 2022 were identified from multiple countries, including the United States, Spain, Switzerland, Georgia, Nigeria, and Turkey. Eligible studies included published reviews, empirical studies, and modeling studies related to MMI and its framework. Data were extracted on study characteristics, legal contexts, economic viability assessment, implementation challenges, and patient safety implications. The included studies address a broad range of malpractice-related issues. The evidence revealed substantial variability in how countries regulate and implement MMI, with notable gaps in practitioner knowledge, legal coherence, and affordability. A lack of awareness of health practitioners, regulatory fragmentation, and economically regressive insurance models continue to shape health practitioners' behavior that could indirectly affect safety and access. The literature lacks robust empirical evaluations that quantify how specific liability reforms translate into improved patient-level outcomes. Future research can prioritize comparative analysis to evaluate policy reforms to create balanced protection for both health practitioners and patients.

Indexed as

Defensive medicinemedical malpracticepatient safetyprofessional liability insurancetort reform

Identifiers

PMID42232378
PMCPMC13225751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.