ArticleBioinformatics and biology insights2026
Listeria Genome Identification Using DNABERT Embedding With LightGBM and SHAP-Based Explainable Classification.
Article in Bioinformatics and biology insights, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prompt and accurate identification of Listeria monocytogenes at the whole-genome level is essential for food safety surveillance and outbreak prevention, yet existing culture-based, PCR, and next-generation sequencing (NGS) workflows are either slow, labor-intensive, or rely on opaque machine learning models with limited interpretability. This study proposes an explainable genomic classification framework that couples transformer-based DNA embeddings with gradient boosting to distinguish Listeria from non-Listeria genomes. A curated dataset of 700 complete bacterial genomes (350 L. monocytogenes and 350 biologically related non-Listeria genomes) was assembled from the NCBI Assembly database and rigorously filtered to retain high-quality assemblies. Each genome was tokenized into overlapping 6-mers and encoded using the pretrained DNABERT model to obtain contextual genome-level embeddings, which were then classified with a LightGBM classifier. Model decisions were interpreted using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to quantify the contribution of individual embedding dimensions and associated k-mer patterns to each prediction. After final verification of the confusion matrix, the proposed DNABERT + LightGBM + SHAP pipeline correctly classified 335/350 Listeria genomes and 330/350 non-Listeria genomes, corresponding to 665/700 correct classifications and a corrected accuracy of 95.00%. The same evaluation yielded precision of 94.37%, recall of 95.71%, F1-score of 95.03%, and an AUC of 0.9976. Comparative experiments show that the framework consistently outperforms conventional k-mer-based Random Forest, TF-IDF + SVM, CNN, XGBoost, and DNABERT + Logistic Regression baselines across all metrics. Beyond its strong predictive performance, SHAP-based analysis reveals discriminative sequence patterns that may correspond to putative genomic signatures of Listeria. Overall, the proposed approach provides a high-performance, interpretable tool for genome-scale Listeria identification and offers a transferable template for explainable pathogen genomics in food safety and public health applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.