ArticlePNAS nexus2026
The role of professional networks and institutional prestige in shaping the first career moves of scholars.
Article in PNAS nexus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mobility of researchers is closely linked to knowledge diffusion, scientific innovation, and international collaboration. While prior research highlights the role of networks in shaping migration flows, the extent to which personal and institutional ties influence the direction of scientific mobility remains unclear. This study leverages large-scale digital trace data from Scopus, capturing the complete mobility trajectories, co-authorship networks, and collaboration histories of 172,000 authors over two decades (1996-2020). Using multinomial and conditional multinomial logit models, we examine scholars' first career move by (i) classifying moves into four network-defined mobility-type categories and (ii) modeling destination choice as a function of co-authorship connection strength, institutional linkages, and institutional prestige. Our findings show that not only first- but also second-order co-authorship ties-connections to a scholar's collaborators' collaborators-are a strong correlate of the direction of a move. Scholars with extensive individual professional networks, particularly those migrating abroad, are more likely to move along individual ties. In contrast, scholars from prestigious institutions, and those moving within national borders, are more likely to follow institutional routes. The destination-choice models confirm that both individual and institutional ties are associated with a higher probability of moving to specific research institutions, with a larger estimated association for individual than for institutional ones. Overall, this research provides empirical evidence on how individual and institutional connections shape scholars' first career mobility. The findings have important implications for migration theory and policy, emphasizing the need to support both individual and institutional collaboration networks to foster global scientific and knowledge exchange.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.