Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42232330›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in surgery2026

Robotic resection of a rudimentary horn pregnancy with the Da Vinci system: first case and systematic review of published cases in the 21st century.

A Favre-Inhofer, P Molnar, L Jung, M Hübner, M Medl, C Jäger, I Juhasz-Böss, S Huwer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

A Favre-InhoferKlinik für Frauenheilkunde, Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
P MolnarKlinik für Frauenheilkunde, Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
L JungKlinik für Frauenheilkunde, Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
M HübnerKlinik für Frauenheilkunde, Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
M MedlKlinik für Frauenheilkunde, Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
C JägerKlinik für Frauenheilkunde, Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
I Juhasz-BössKlinik für Frauenheilkunde, Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
S HuwerKlinik für Frauenheilkunde, Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Rudimentary horn pregnancy is a rare, high-risk ectopic gestation associated with significant maternal and fetal morbidity. Advances in minimally invasive surgery have expanded management options, but robotic-assisted resections have not been previously reported. Objectives: This study aims to present the first robotic resection of a non-communicating rudimentary horn pregnancy and systematically review all published cases from 2000 onward to summarize diagnostic and management outcomes. Data sources: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed up to August 14, 2025. Eligibility criteria: We included English-language case reports and series of non-communicating rudimentary horn pregnancies published from 2000 onward. Methods: Data on patient characteristics, diagnostic modalities, management strategies, and maternal-fetal outcomes were extracted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Results: The review identified 187 cases across 163 publications. Most pregnancies were diagnosed intraoperatively, with rupture occurring in 44%-predominantly during the second trimester-and a maternal mortality rate of 1.2%. Placenta accreta spectrum was reported in 39% of cases. Minimally invasive procedures, including our published robotic approach, are increasingly used in selected stable patients. Limitations: The evidence is based primarily on retrospective case reports, which are prone to publication bias and heterogeneity. Conclusions: Rudimentary horn pregnancy poses significant diagnostic and surgical challenges with high risk of rupture. Early recognition and minimally invasive management-including robotic surgery-may improve outcomes. Continued systematic reporting is critical to guide clinical practice.

Indexed as

ectopic pregnancyminimal invasive surgery (MIS)robotic surgeryrudimentary horn pregnancysystematic reviewuterine anomaly

Identifiers

PMID42232330
PMCPMC13223003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.