Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42232272›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized surgery2025

Robotic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy: rediscovering a proven approach in the era of minimally invasive surgery.

Michele Slawitz, Francesco Dinale, Annalisa Patera, Giulia Di Marco, Giulio Gaetano Guarino, Tommaso Bocchialini, Francesco Ziglioli, Davide Campobasso, Salvatore Micali, Umberto Vittorio Maestroni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michele SlawitzDepartment of Urology, University-Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Francesco DinaleDepartment of Urology, University-Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Annalisa PateraDepartment of Urology, University-Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Giulia Di MarcoDepartment of Urology, University-Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Giulio Gaetano GuarinoDepartment of Urology, University-Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Tommaso BocchialiniDepartment of Urology, University-Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Francesco ZiglioliDepartment of Urology, University-Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Davide CampobassoDepartment of Urology, University-Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Salvatore MicaliDepartment of Urology, University-Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Umberto Vittorio MaestroniDepartment of Urology, University-Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for approximately 3% of all malignancies, with its incidence steadily increasing due to the widespread use of abdominal imaging techniques and the improved detection of asymptomatic renal masses. Traditionally, radical nephrectomy (RN) was considered the gold standard for the surgical treatment of renal tumors. However, over the past decades, advancements in minimally invasive surgical techniques have led to a paradigm shift in favor of nephron-sparing approaches, particularly partial nephrectomy (PN). The introduction of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) has further refined this approach by enhancing surgical precision, reducing invasiveness, and improving outcomes in terms of renal function preservation. This manuscript describes a standardized and reproducible technique for retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (rRAPN) using the da Vinci Xi system, illustrated through two representative cases involving right- and left-sided posterior renal tumors. Key steps in the procedure included the creation of a retroperitoneal space, identification of crucial anatomical structures, excision of the tumor using a clamp-less technique, the suture of the resection bed and the application of hemostatic agents to control bleeding. Postoperative care focused on monitoring renal function, detecting complications, and ensuring optimal recovery. Both patients had successful outcomes, with minimal blood loss, stable renal function, and negative surgical margins. Furthermore, there were no postoperative complications, and both patients were discharged within 4 or 5 days of the procedure. Retroperitoneal access offers distinct advantages, particularly for patients with previous abdominal surgeries or for those with tumors located in the posterior renal region. This approach provides oncological and functional outcomes that are comparable to transperitoneal techniques while reducing perioperative morbidity. The detailed steps outlined in this study aim to facilitate the broader adoption of rRAPN, emphasizing its potential to improve the management of select renal neoplasms. By standardizing this technique, we aim to further refine the role of retroperitoneal robot-assisted surgery in treating RCC and promote its integration into routine clinical practice.

Indexed as

partial nephrectomy (PN)renal cancerretroperitonealRobotic

Identifiers

PMID42232272
PMCPMC13225019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.