Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42232266›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized surgery2025

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery as redo approach after prior open lobectomy: is it safely feasible?-challenges and pitfalls of a complex surgical technique.

Samuele Nicotra, Vincenzo Verzeletti, Alberto Busetto, Alessandro Bonis, Enrica Pellizzer, Alessandro Rebusso, Giovanni Maria Comacchio, Andrea Dell'Amore, Federico Rea

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Samuele NicotraThoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Padova University Hospital, Padua, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9629-4240
Vincenzo VerzelettiThoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Padova University Hospital, Padua, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7239-1248
Alberto BusettoThoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Padova University Hospital, Padua, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5284-3227
Alessandro BonisThoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Padova University Hospital, Padua, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9422-0597
Enrica PellizzerThoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Padova University Hospital, Padua, Italy.
Alessandro RebussoThoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Padova University Hospital, Padua, Italy.
Giovanni Maria ComacchioThoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Padova University Hospital, Padua, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3166-1843
Andrea Dell'AmoreThoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Padova University Hospital, Padua, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1384-7441
Federico ReaThoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Padova University Hospital, Padua, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8632-3465

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minimally invasive segmentectomy/lobectomy is an alternative to traditional thoracotomy for the treating lung cancer, offering benefits such as reduced postoperative pain, shorter recovery times and improved cosmetic outcomes. However, its feasibility in patients with a history of prior thoracotomy remains debated due to potential pleuro-parenchymal adhesions, scarring and hilar fibrosis with altered anatomy, which may increase the complication rate. This paper addresses some technical considerations about redo video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) major lung resection in patients with a history of thoracotomy. We describe the preoperative planning, anesthetic preparation for these cases, and a step-by-step description of the surgical strategy used in our center. Moreover, we discuss principles for postoperative care and follow-up, with specific attention to managing complications. The main concerns in redo cases are about the higher rates of postoperative bleeding and prolonged air-leaks, often associated with mobilizing dense adhesions and scar tissue during surgery. Redo VATS major lung resections following a prior thoracotomy offer substantial advantages in terms of reduced morbidity and faster recovery, but also present challenges related to adhesions, compromised anatomy and patient-specific factors. The decision to pursue this approach is made on a case-by-case basis, weighing the patient's overall performance status, challenges posed by the prior surgery and the surgeon's expertise.

Indexed as

redo VATSthoracoscopic reoperationthoracotomyVideo-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)

Identifiers

PMID42232266
PMCPMC13225056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.