ArticleJournal of visualized surgery2025
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery as redo approach after prior open lobectomy: is it safely feasible?-challenges and pitfalls of a complex surgical technique.
Article in Journal of visualized surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Minimally invasive segmentectomy/lobectomy is an alternative to traditional thoracotomy for the treating lung cancer, offering benefits such as reduced postoperative pain, shorter recovery times and improved cosmetic outcomes. However, its feasibility in patients with a history of prior thoracotomy remains debated due to potential pleuro-parenchymal adhesions, scarring and hilar fibrosis with altered anatomy, which may increase the complication rate. This paper addresses some technical considerations about redo video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) major lung resection in patients with a history of thoracotomy. We describe the preoperative planning, anesthetic preparation for these cases, and a step-by-step description of the surgical strategy used in our center. Moreover, we discuss principles for postoperative care and follow-up, with specific attention to managing complications. The main concerns in redo cases are about the higher rates of postoperative bleeding and prolonged air-leaks, often associated with mobilizing dense adhesions and scar tissue during surgery. Redo VATS major lung resections following a prior thoracotomy offer substantial advantages in terms of reduced morbidity and faster recovery, but also present challenges related to adhesions, compromised anatomy and patient-specific factors. The decision to pursue this approach is made on a case-by-case basis, weighing the patient's overall performance status, challenges posed by the prior surgery and the surgeon's expertise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.