ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2026
Robust framework for adaptive field-of-view automatic segmentation in vaginal brachytherapy for endometrial cancer.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: The lack of robust automatic tools for segmentation in vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) limits efficiency and reproducibility in clinical practice. We aimed to develop a framework for automatic segmentation of the clinical target volume (CTV) and organs of interest (OOIs) for endometrial cancer patients that undergo vaginal cuff brachytherapy. Material and methods: We developed a three-step framework based on nnUNet and adapted to our context to segment the CTV/OOIs on pre-treatment computed tomography (CT) scans. Our method was adaptive to different contouring protocols used in clinical practice, where images were partly labelled, by either providing labels within a region of interest and/or considering only a subset of present structures. A dataset of 289 patients treated between 2014 and 2021 was used for model development (139/35/115 for training, validation and testing). Results: The Dice similarity coefficient of the CTV was 87.7%, while OOI Dice coefficients were 72.6%, 88.9%, 86.3% for the small bowel, bladder and rectum, respectively. The average absolute D Conclusions: Our method segmented the CTV and OOIs from CT scans with high quality and reliable dose calculations within the relevant range. Our framework outperformed state-of-the-art methods and potentially could help reduce complexity and time in VBT protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.