ArticleMolecular therapy. Advances2026
Impact of downstream purification process and AAV serotype on protein-impurity clearance.
Article in Molecular therapy. Advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Host cell proteins (HCPs) are process-related impurities in recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) gene therapy products and are monitored as critical quality attributes. We assessed residual proteins to evaluate the impact of serotype and downstream processing, as well as to benchmark the performance of orthogonal analytical methods. Four AAV serotypes-AAV8, C8-R5#704, AAV9, and LICA1-encoding the same GFP transgene were produced under an identical upstream protocol; in-process and drug substance (DS) samples were analyzed by commercial, in-house ELISAs and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methods. Purification efficiently reduced the HCP burden, and no serotype-specific HCP signature was evidenced. In contrast, the purification design was the primary driver of the residual profile: a dual-step chromatography (affinity followed by mixed mode) reduced the number of detectable HCPs by half and decreased their relative abundance compared with single-step affinity capture. Several proteins persisted across batches and purification processes, suggesting protein-capsid interactions that may limit clearance. Furthermore, plasmid-derived proteins-including AAV replicase (Rep) isoforms and adenoviral proteins-were detected in DS following single-step purification and were largely removed by the second chromatographic step. These findings highlight the importance of orthogonal analytical methods for comprehensive impurity profiling and support risk-based process optimization to minimize residual proteins and ensure consistent, safe rAAV products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.