ArticleBrain & spine2026
Technical and anatomical determinants of ischemic complications in unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysm surgery: The role of temporary arterial occlusion.
Article in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Ischemic complications (IC) remain a major source of morbidity following microsurgical treatment of unruptured middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysms. The contribution of temporary arterial occlusion (TAO) to ischemic risk remains debated, particularly given potential confounding by anatomical and intraoperative factors. Research question: What are the primary determinants of clinically evident IC in unruptured MCA aneurysm surgery, and what is the role of TAO? Methods: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients undergoing clipping of unruptured MCA aneurysms between 2023 and 2025. Clinically evident IC was defined as a new postoperative neurological deficit with corresponding ischemic lesions on MRI in symptomatic patients only. Associations with IC were assessed using Firth's penalized logistic regression. Results: Forty-seven patients were included. TAO was used in 60% of cases and was associated with larger aneurysm size (8.3 ± 2.7 vs 6.8 ± 2.4 mm; p = 0.048). TAO, including repeated and prolonged applications, was not associated with IC (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.06-6.97; p = 0.74). A short pre-aneurysmal M1 segment (OR 30.4; p = 0.034) and intraoperative rupture (OR 17.4; p = 0.031) were associated with IC. All IC occurred in patients with a short M1 segment and were related to perforator injury during dissection or clipping. Complete occlusion was achieved in all cases; morbidity was 4.3%. Conclusion: Clinically evident ischemic complications are primarily driven by anatomical constraints and clipping strategy rather than TAO. TAO should be considered a technical adjunct rather than a dominant determinant of ischemic risk. These findings warrant validation in larger prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.