ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
A RAIR-ATC transcriptional axis and multimodal drug-response modelling reveal class-level vulnerabilities in thyroid cancer.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Radioiodine-refractory papillary thyroid carcinoma (RAIR PTC) and anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) are clinically challenging thyroid cancer states, yet the molecular continuum between radioiodine refractoriness, anaplastic transformation and targeted drug sensitivity remains unclear. We hypothesised that RAIR and ATC share a common transcriptional axis that can be distilled into a transferable signature to prioritise targeted therapies in RAIR-like models. Methods: We integrated RNA-seq and microarray cohorts (TCGA-THCA, one RAIR vs. radioiodine-avid PTC cohort, and five ATC cohorts) to derive RAIR/ATC gene modules and annotate pathway activity (MSigDB Hallmark). A single-sample RAIR signature was applied to TCGA tumours and DepMap thyroid cell lines. We combined RAIR scores with PRISM drug-response AUC data (18 thyroid cell lines) to quantify differential sensitivity (ΔAUC) and trained an interpretable multimodal ridge model integrating cell and drug features to predict AUC. External transferability and pharmacology-oriented mechanisms were assessed in an independent thyroid RNA-seq cohort (GSE126698) using ssGSEA and mechanism-relevant pathways. Results: RAIR and ATC upregulated modules converged on an EMT-angiogenesis-inflammatory/interferon axis, with ATC representing a more extreme state. The RAIR signature stratified TCGA tumours with graded activation of these programs and was largely independent of BRAF and TERT promoter status, while preserving pathway associations when transferred to DepMap. In PRISM, VEGFR/KDR and RAF/BRAF inhibitor classes showed the most negative class-averaged ΔAUC values, indicating preferential activity in RAIR-high thyroid lines. The multimodal ridge model improved AUC prediction over cell-only or drug-only baselines and was concordant with class-level sensitivity patterns. In GSE126698, RAIR scores retained robust associations with hypoxia and interferon/inflammatory programs and aligned with drug-mechanism pathways including KRAS signaling up and PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling. Initial Conclusion: A module-based RAIR signature captures a disease-focused component of a broader RAIR-ATC axis, transfers to cell-line models and can be embedded into an interpretable multimodal framework for drug-response prediction and targeted drug-class prioritisation, prioritising VEGFR/KDR and RAF/BRAF inhibitor classes as candidates for further translational evaluation in RAIR-like thyroid models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.