ArticleFrontiers in neurology
A CT radiomics nomogram predicts visual acuity improvement in patients with indirect traumatic optic neuropathy following optic canal decompression.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Indirect traumatic optic neuropathy (ITON) is a common cause of persistent visual impairment following craniofacial trauma. While optic canal decompression (OCD) serves as a primary surgical intervention, its efficacy is variable, with approximately half of the patients failing to achieve significant visual acuity (VA) recovery. Existing models for predicting surgical outcomes lack sufficient accuracy and generalizability. Materials and methods: This retrospective, single-center study included 169 patients with ITON who underwent OCD between May 2014 and October 2025. Participants were randomly assigned to training ( Results: The final nomogram incorporated nine radiomics features and three clinical predictors. It demonstrated robust discriminative ability, with area under the curve values of 0.840 in the training set and 0.832 in the test set. This tool effectively categorized patients into distinct risk groups for poor VA recovery. VA improvement rates were significantly higher in the low-risk group than in the high-risk group in both the training (87.9% vs. 30.5%) and test (87.0% vs. 28.6%) cohorts. Calibration and decision curve analyses confirmed the superior performance and clinical net benefit of the combined model over those relying solely on clinical or radiomics features. Conclusion: The developed clinical-radiomics nomogram represents a valuable non-invasive tool for the preoperative prediction of VA improvement following OCD in patients with ITON, showing significant potential to inform personalized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.