Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42232106›Full record

ArticleAphasiology2026

Aphasia severity mediates the relationship between attention and sentence comprehension.

Emily J Lenz, Arianna N LaCroix

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aphasiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emily J LenzDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Arianna N LaCroixDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4130-6199

Funding

Diversity SupplementT32DC000030 · NIDCD · PURDUE UNIVERSITY WEST LAFAYETTE · PI Arielle Borovsky, Preeti M. Sivasankar · 1991 to 2026
$5.4M
Optimizing the assessment of auditory attention in aphasiaR21DC021481 · NIDCD · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI Arianna LaCroix · 2024 to 2026
$570k
NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC021481NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prior studies report mixed associations between attention and language in people with aphasia (PWA), raising the possibility that their relationship may be influenced by another factor, such as aphasia severity. We examined this possibility by testing whether alerting, orienting, and executive control attention vary as a function of aphasia severity and whether severity statistically mediates their association with sentence comprehension. Methods: In a retrospective analysis combining data from two prior studies, 58 individuals with aphasia, ranging from latent to severe, and 21 neurotypical controls completed the Attention Network Test and a sentence-picture matching task. Group differences in attention were assessed using ANOVAs, and linear mixed-effects models evaluated the presence of each attentional effect within groups. Correlations and structural equation modeling examined associations among attention, aphasia severity, and sentence comprehension. Results: All three attention types were present in the control and mild aphasia groups; only orienting and executive control were observed in the latent group, and only executive control in the moderate and severe groups. Orienting and executive control performance declined with increasing aphasia severity, whereas alerting did not differ by severity. Stronger orienting and executive control were associated with more efficient sentence comprehension, but this relationship was statistically mediated by aphasia severity. Conclusions: These findings suggest that associations between domain-general attention and sentence comprehension are best understood within the broader context of aphasia severity and highlight the need for future research clarifying the directionality of this relationship.

Indexed as

Aphasiaattentionexecutive controlorientingsentence comprehension

Identifiers

PMID42232106
PMCPMC13225851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.