Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42232093›Full record

ReviewDrug design, development and therapy2026

Dexmedetomidine Dosing Strategies in Sedation and Anesthesia: Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Clinical Applications - A Narrative Review.

Yung-Fong Tsai, Tsung-Hsiao Shih, Jyu-Shiou Ho, Shao-Chun Wu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug design, development and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yung-Fong TsaiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.ORCID 0009-0007-6130-7603
Tsung-Hsiao ShihCollege of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Jyu-Shiou Ho *Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Hualien, Taiwan.
Shao-Chun Wu *College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-0984-6921

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Dexmedetomidine (DEX), a highly selective α2-adrenoceptor agonist, may produce arousable sedation through locus coeruleus-mediated noradrenergic suppression while preserving respiratory drive. Its clinical applications have expanded beyond intensive care unit (ICU) sedation to procedural sedation, anesthesia adjunction, and non-operating room settings. However, substantial heterogeneity in dosing regimens has impeded the formulation of standardized clinical protocols. Objective: This narrative review synthesizes evidence identified through a MeSH-based search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (January 2020-Dec 2025), supplemented by chain referencing of foundational earlier studies, to evaluate dexmedetomidine dosing strategies, pharmacokinetics, safety, comparative efficacy, combination regimens, non-intravenous routes, and special-population considerations across sedation and anesthesia contexts. Results: Reported bolus doses span a 60-fold range (0.05-3 μg/kg). In adults, doses of 0.25-0.5 μg/kg over 10 minutes appear to provide adequate procedural sedation with acceptable hemodynamic effects; pediatric studies report success rates exceeding 90% at 2 μg/kg. Dose-dependent bradycardia and hypotension are common but generally transient. Compared with propofol, DEX has been associated with more favorable respiratory stability but slower onset and recovery. Compared with conventional sedatives (primarily midazolam), DEX has been associated with lower delirium incidence and shorter mechanical ventilation duration in selected ICU trials, although these findings derive from heterogeneous study designs. Individual trials have reported opioid-sparing effects of up to 60%, though generalizability requires confirmation. Combination regimens with ketamine or propofol may offer synergistic benefits. Intranasal and subcutaneous routes provide non-invasive alternatives, particularly in pediatric practice. Special populations-including neonates, patients with cardiorespiratory morbidities, and obese patients-require population-specific dosing adjustments. Conclusion: The available evidence suggests that dexmedetomidine offers a generally favorable safety profile across sedation and anesthesia contexts. However, conclusions are limited by dosing heterogeneity, small sample sizes, inconsistent outcome definitions, and absent long-term safety data. Standardized multicenter trials with uniform outcome criteria are needed to establish definitive dosing recommendations.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaDexmedetomidineHypnotics and SedativesDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansDexmedetomidineHypnotics and Sedativescritical caredexmedetomidinepediatric anesthesiapharmacokineticssedationtarget-controlled infusion

Identifiers

PMID42232093
PMCPMC13225142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.