SynthesisFrontiers in veterinary science2026
Electrophysiologic evidence of loss of consciousness in cattle during slaughter with and without stunning: a systematic review and methodological overview.
Synthesis in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Common carotid artery occlusion during slaughter without stunning in cattle: incidence and evidence for physiological significance-a systematic review.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Slaughter without prior stunning as practiced under Jewish and Islamic religious law raises certain particular animal welfare issues, notably the time between the incision and loss of consciousness (LOC). LOC marks the point at which cortical processing required for perception, including pain, is no longer possible. Quantifying time to LOC in animals is challenging. To date, the most direct and potentially objective means of doing so is the use of electrophysiologic methods. These are the focus of this paper. Methods: This paper includes a concise discussion of electrophysiology as applied to slaughter, addressing a critical gap in foundational electrophysiologic knowledge required to interpret LOC and insensibility in the veterinary literature. Then, using a PRISMA-guided systematic approach, this review synthesizes neurophysiologic evidence on time to LOC in cattle. A review was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar (through December 2025). Experimental cattle studies using EEG, ECoG, or evoked potentials were included, while non-bovine, behavioral-only, or methodologically insufficient studies were excluded. Nine studies were included, and risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I. Results: Overall risk of bias across included studies was judged to be moderate. Studies using electrocorticography (ECoG) reported electrophysiologic markers consistent with LOC occurring between 4.4 and 13 seconds after incision, with mean values ranging from 7.5 to 10.8 seconds. Reported times vary across studies, particularly those using scalp EEG, likely due to methodological differences and limitations. Conclusions: The highest-quality available electrophysiologic data, suggests that LOC occurs rapidly following slaughter without stunning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.