Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42232043›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized surgery2026

Nipple and areola reduction for gender-affirming mastectomy: a novel and reproducible surgical technique.

Keith Sweitzer, Piper Schneider, Jose Guilherme Christiano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Keith SweitzerDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Piper SchneiderDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Jose Guilherme ChristianoDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The placement and appearance of the nipple following female to male gender affirming mastectomy is a well-documented factor in patient satisfaction. However, very little discussion of surgical techniques for nipple reduction itself exists, which we believe to be a cosmetically important area to be addressed in gender affirming surgery. Many existing techniques focus on reduction in projection without modifying the whole complex, and very few describe nipple grafting as a strategy. This article addresses a significant gap in the surgical literature, as achieving masculine chest aesthetics requires attention to the diameter, projection, and proportions of the nipple-areola complex relative to chest wall dimensions. In this article we present a single surgeon's 10-year experience of a step by step and easily reproducible approach to a novel technique for nipple reduction for double incision mastectomy with nipple-areola complex grating. This approach presents one standardized technique offering strategies for reduction, optimizing projection, and optimizing placement of the nipple graft in a female to male gender affirming mastectomy. The technique presented in this article allows for simultaneous modification of nipple size and shape by integrating nipple reduction as a routine component of the double incision procedure rather than treating it as a secondary consideration, optimizing efficiency. Although the approach is simple, it provides a framework for achieving optimal cosmetic outcomes in female to male gender affirming mastectomies. The reproducibility of this standardized approach across diverse patient anatomies makes it a valuable addition to the arsenal of surgical techniques for gender affirming chest reconstruction.

Indexed as

gender affirming mastectomyNipple and areola reductionnipple-areola complex reduction (NAC reduction)nipple graftsurgical technique

Identifiers

PMID42232043
PMCPMC13225033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.