ArticleJournal of visualized surgery2026
Micro-incision uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax in an adolescent: a technical case report.
Article in Journal of visualized surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) commonly affects adolescents and young adults, with recurrence reaching 30%. While uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (U-VATS) has improved cosmetic outcomes and reduced access trauma, micro-incision access (<2 cm) introduces significant technical constraints, particularly regarding triangulation and instrument crowding. This report describes the successful management of an adolescent PSP case using a 1.8-cm U-VATS bullectomy, specifically addressing the technical challenges of ultra-small access through targeted ergonomic refinements. Case Description: A 15-year-old male with recurrent-risk apical bullae underwent U-VATS bullectomy via a 1.8-cm incision. To overcome the limited working corridor, two specific intraoperative refinements were employed: (I) a traction-suture technique to stabilize fragile lung parenchyma and guide the stapler trajectory; and (II) staple-line pre-compression with atraumatic forceps to ensure precise stapler alignment and secure closure. Resection was completed using a slim articulating stapler, followed by staple-line reinforcement with polyglycolic acid (PGA) sheets and fibrin glue. Enhanced recovery protocols, including early chest tube removal (4 hours postoperatively), facilitated discharge on postoperative day (POD) 1. The patient remained asymptomatic and recurrence-free at the 1-month follow-up. Conclusions: This case suggests that micro-incision U-VATS bullectomy is technically feasible when supported by ergonomic refinements such as traction suturing and pre-compression. These techniques may compensate for the inherent loss of triangulation in ultra-small access, though their broader clinical efficacy and safety profiles require further validation in larger patient cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.