Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42231973›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

From technology to interaction: How ritual interaction drives participation intention in immersive digital environments.

Dong Lu, Hao Peng, Tian Wang, Ivan Ka Wai Lai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dong LuSchool of Economics and Management, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610101, China.
Hao PengSchool of Economics and Management, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610101, China.
Tian WangSchool of Economics and Management, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610101, China.
Ivan Ka Wai LaiCentre for Gaming and Tourism Studies, Macao Polytechnic University, Macau 999078, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite rapid advances in immersive technologies (AR, VR, and MR), many digital experiences struggle to sustain user participation. Prior research emphasizes technological realism while overlooking how structured interactions shape meaning-making and motivation. Drawing on interaction ritual chains (IRC) theory, this study introduces ritual interaction (RI)-comprising contextual elements, ritual symbols, scripted processes, and shared emotion-to examine its impact on participation intention. Using PLS-SEM, results show that RI influences participation through a sequential psychological process: it enhances immersion, which strengthens presence, ultimately driving participation intention. Immersion plays a more proximal role than presence. Moderation analysis indicates that experience type strengthens the effect of RI on immersion in culture-based, but not nature-based, environments. By shifting focus from technological affordances to interactional structure, this study highlights how structured interaction can motivate participation and informs the design of immersive systems while contributing to human-computer interaction and mediated social behavior research.

Indexed as

human-computer interactioninterdisciplinary application studies

Identifiers

PMID42231973
PMCPMC13224139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.