Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42231885›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026

Application of seed micromorphology in taxonomy of the genus

Katarzyna Sanek, Sławomir Nowak, Przemysław Baranow, Marta Kolanowska, Konrad Kaczmarek, Ann Bogaerts, Sofie De Smedt, Agnieszka Rewicz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Katarzyna SanekDepartment of Geobotany and Plant Ecology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection,University of Łódź, Łódź, Poland.
Sławomir NowakDepartment of Plant Taxonomy and Nature Conservation, University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Przemysław BaranowDepartment of Plant Taxonomy and Nature Conservation, University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Marta KolanowskaDepartment of Geobotany and Plant Ecology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection,University of Łódź, Łódź, Poland.
Konrad KaczmarekDepartment of Geobotany and Plant Ecology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection,University of Łódź, Łódź, Poland.
Ann BogaertsMeise Botanic Garden, Meise, Belgium.
Sofie De SmedtMeise Botanic Garden, Meise, Belgium.
Agnieszka RewiczDepartment of Geobotany and Plant Ecology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection,University of Łódź, Łódź, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Seed morphology is widely used as an auxiliary source of evidence in orchid systematics, but its taxonomic value varies among lineages. For several genera within Vandeae, the extent to which seed traits reflect phylogenetic relationships or provide diagnostic features remains insufficiently evaluated. Methods: To assess the systematic relevance of seed characters, we examined a broad set of qualitative and quantitative traits across representatives of the genus Results: The analyses revealed that some seed characters display consistent patterns within Discussion: The results demonstrate that seed morphology provides a useful, though not standalone, source of taxonomic information within the studied group. Patterns observed across taxa indicate that seed traits can reinforce existing hypotheses of relationships and highlight potential discrepancies where boundaries may require reassessment. The findings emphasize the value of integrating seed morphology with molecular and ecological evidence to improve the resolution of taxonomic questions in

Indexed as

anticlinal wallherbarium specimensPolystachyinaeseed coat cellsSEM

Identifiers

PMID42231885
PMCPMC13223086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.