ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
Bidirectional Kazakh Sign Language prosody-aware translation using computer vision and speech recognition techniques.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study presents a bidirectional communication system designed to enhance interaction between hearing-impaired and hearing individuals using gesture recognition. Methods: The proposed framework integrates multiple components, including Kazakh Sign Language (KSL) gesture detection, closed-set sentence classification, speech recognition, and speech generation. The system is trained and evaluated using a dataset consisting of images and video recordings of KSL gestures together with audio data for Kazakh speech synthesis. Results: Experimental evaluation demonstrates that the overall system achieves a sentence classification accuracy of 92% across 12 closed-set sentence classes, while individual model accuracy did not fall below 87%. Compared to other approaches, the proposed method achieved competitive results in terms of accuracy on the collected dataset; however, inference speed comparisons are module-specific and measured as latency in ms/sample. Discussion: The results confirm the feasibility of the proposed approach as a proof-of-concept for improving accessibility and communication through automated sign language understanding. The system demonstrates practical applicability in bridging the communication gap between signers and non-signers, thereby promoting greater accessibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.