ReviewPublic health nursing (Boston, Mass.)
Measuring Reasons for Unfinished Nursing Care as Perceived by Community Care Nurses: A Binational Development and Validation Study.
Review in Public health nursing (Boston, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Measuring Reasons for Unfinished Nursing Care as Perceived by Community Care Nurses: A Binational Development and Validation Study.Public health nursing (Boston, Mass.)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo develop and validate the Unfinished Community Nursing Care Reasons Survey (UCNC_RS) transnationally and compare Unfinished Nursing Care (UNC) reasons across countries.
designThis development and validation study was conducted in Israel and Italy, following the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments guidelines. SAMPLE AND MEASUREMENT: Tool identification, adaptation, and development were followed by content and language validation; structural validation was then performed with 309 community nurses (156 in Israel and 153 in Italy) who agreed to participate. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), Mokken analysis, and descriptive statistics were conducted.
resultsThe UCNC_RS consists of 23 items. Israeli EFA identified three factors, while the Italian EFA identified two, with items loading on more than one factor in both countries. Mokken analysis indicated a good model fit. Reasons for UNC differed between countries, both in their order of importance and in their averages, indicating different patterns of perceived elements affecting UNC occurrence.
conclusionOverall, the UCNC_RS may be used in daily practice to survey and proactively address factors that may increase the occurrence of UNC. Reasons for UNC are organized hierarchically, suggesting that actions should target different system levels to reduce its occurrence. In Israel, priority policies are needed at the macro-, exo-, and nurse-system levels, while in Italy, policies are needed at the macro-, meso-, and micro-levels. Moreover, the reasons for UNC differ across countries, both in their order of importance and in their scores, with only some common elements, indicating different patterns of perceived reasons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.