ArticlePhysiological reports2026
Phenotyping hemodynamic response to veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in cardiogenic shock.
Article in Physiological reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Simulation models suggest that veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) uniformly results in left ventricular (LV) distension in cardiogenic shock (CS). This study characterized the hemodynamic response to VA ECMO in animal models of CS, and in patients with CS. LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) and arterial pulse pressure (PP) were assessed in 58 pigs with CS at 2 levels of VA ECMO flows. Pulmonary artery diastolic pressure (PADP), PA pulse pressure (PAPP), and arterial PP data were collected within 2 h of VA ECMO from 128 patients with CS. The animal study identified 3 phenotypes. The centroids of LVEDP and arterial PP changes for Cluster 1 were +4.99 and -1.85 mmHg, Cluster 2 +0.02 and -5.57 mmHg, and Cluster 3 +1.31 and +15.5 mmHg. The clinical study identified 3 phenotypes: "pulsatile" phenotype (26%, highest arterial PP), "low pulsatility" phenotype (52%, low arterial PP and PAPP), and "LV distension" phenotype (22%, elevated PADP). Acute MI was more common in the "LV distension" phenotype. The "low pulsatility" phenotype had a larger RV diameter and tricuspid regurgitation. In summary, this study identified three hemodynamic phenotypes early post-VA ECMO that were related to the underlying CS etiology and RV function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.