Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42231678›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2026

Phenotyping hemodynamic response to veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in cardiogenic shock.

Hoong Sern Lim, Dagmar Vondrakova, Mikulas Micek, Petr Ostadal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hoong Sern LimDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6569-1805
Dagmar VondrakovaDepartment of Cardiology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Mikulas MicekDepartment of Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Petr OstadalDepartment of Cardiology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Simulation models suggest that veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) uniformly results in left ventricular (LV) distension in cardiogenic shock (CS). This study characterized the hemodynamic response to VA ECMO in animal models of CS, and in patients with CS. LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) and arterial pulse pressure (PP) were assessed in 58 pigs with CS at 2 levels of VA ECMO flows. Pulmonary artery diastolic pressure (PADP), PA pulse pressure (PAPP), and arterial PP data were collected within 2 h of VA ECMO from 128 patients with CS. The animal study identified 3 phenotypes. The centroids of LVEDP and arterial PP changes for Cluster 1 were +4.99 and -1.85 mmHg, Cluster 2 +0.02 and -5.57 mmHg, and Cluster 3 +1.31 and +15.5 mmHg. The clinical study identified 3 phenotypes: "pulsatile" phenotype (26%, highest arterial PP), "low pulsatility" phenotype (52%, low arterial PP and PAPP), and "LV distension" phenotype (22%, elevated PADP). Acute MI was more common in the "LV distension" phenotype. The "low pulsatility" phenotype had a larger RV diameter and tricuspid regurgitation. In summary, this study identified three hemodynamic phenotypes early post-VA ECMO that were related to the underlying CS etiology and RV function.

Indexed as

Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationHemodynamicsShock, CardiogenicAnimalsBlood PressureFemaleHumansMalePhenotypeSwinecardiogenic shockextracorporeal membrane oxygenationphysiology

Identifiers

PMID42231678
PMCPMC13239767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.