ArticleCancer medicine2026
Changes in Distress Screening and Information Reception Among Cancer Patients Following a Training for Oncology Nursing Staff: A Pilot Study.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAt least half of all cancer patients suffer from significant psychological distress, yet despite well-validated screening procedures, distress often goes unrecognized or untreated. For this reason, a special training (OptiScreen-Training) on this topic has been developed for oncology nurses and carried out on three visceral oncology wards.
aimsInvestigate whether this training influences patients' psychological symptoms, experience of distress screening, informedness, receipt of recommendation, and utilization of support.
methodsTo evaluate implementation, a prospective, non-randomized pre-post pilot study was conducted with two independent patient samples. N = 112 patients of the control group (CG, "care-as-usual") completed questionnaires before the OptiScreen-Training and N = 210 different patients of the intervention group (IG) after the training. All patients had a gastrointestinal cancer diagnosis; the majority of both samples received surgery (58.1%-79.5%) as curative treatment (61.9%-77.7%) for colon cancer (33.3%-35.7%); were male (61%-63%); and mean age was 62 years (range 21-91; SD = 11.80-13.06).
resultsThere was no significant difference between the CG and IG in terms of psychological distress, resources, or needs (p = 0.274-0.975), nor in the receipt of recommendations (p = 0.748) or the use of psycho-oncological support (p = 0.648). In the IG, more patients indicated that they had completed a screening questionnaire (63.0% vs. 43.3%, p = 0.001) and received psycho-oncology information material (68.3% vs. 46.2%; p < 0.001).
conclusionFollowing the OptiScreen-Training more patients reported they had been screened and informed, suggesting nursing staff are applying it in practice. However, it did not affect support use or distress levels, highlighting that screening alone isn't enough to improve psycho-oncological care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.