ArticleBMC psychology2026
Beyond "normative" loss: social context, loss integration, and adaptation to parental bereavement in midlife.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Midlife parental loss is often viewed as a normative transition, yet it remains socially underrecognized and under-investigated despite its significant psychological impact. Such perception fosters social disenfranchisement and may impede loss integration. This study investigated the psychological impact of midlife parental bereavement by comparing indicators of mental health and well-being, between bereaved and non-bereaved adults. Furthermore, it examined how social context influences grief intensity through the mediating role of loss integration. A sample of 423 adults aged 35-65 was categorized into dual-parental loss (n = 122), single-parental loss (n = 122), and non-bereaved (n = 179) groups. Measures included general psychological distress (PHQ-4), scales of happiness and subjective health, grief intensity (TRIG-PR), loss integration (ISLES-SF), and perceived social support and social recognition. Results showed no significant group differences in general psychological distress, happiness, health, or grief intensity. However, structural equation modeling showed that social recognition was positively associated with loss integration, which in turn predicted lower grief intensity (R² = 0.43). In contrast, socio-emotional support was directly associated with lower general psychological distress (R² = 0.09) but not with grief-specific outcomes. These findings underscore the distinct roles of social mechanisms in midlife bereavement and highlight the importance of social recognition in facilitating adaptive grief integration among this age group. The study advocates for community-based policies and therapeutic approaches that validate midlife bereavement during this unique developmental life stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.