ArticleMaternal health, neonatology and perinatology2026
Omphalocele with a patent vitelline duct: intraoperative identification of an uncommon presentation.
Article in Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOmphalocele with a concomitant patent vitelline duct is a rare presentation, with very few cases reported in the literature. Most reported cases present with visible bowel prolapse, meconium drainage or mucosal exposure at birth. Presentations without obvious intestinal herniation or mucosal exposure are extremely uncommon and pose diagnostic challenges. CASE PRESENTATION: A male neonate was born to a G3P2 mother at 38 + 6/7 weeks via spontaneous vaginal delivery after a pregnancy notable for a 20-week prenatal ultrasound concerning for omphalocele. Upon delivery, the omphalocele membrane was intact. Shortly after birth, the neonate developed persistent bilious emesis. Abdominal ultrasound demonstrated normal rotation, and abdominal X-ray was reassuring without evidence of obstruction or volvulus. No other congenital anomalies were demonstrated after VACTERL workup, including echocardiogram, abdominal and spinal ultrasounds. Genetic testing for Beckwith-Wiedmann syndrome was found to be normal. Surgical exploration revealed a patent vitelline duct fistula connecting the small bowel to the omphalocele sac. The fistula and adjacent small bowel were resected, followed by primary end-to-end anastomosis and primary fascial closure. The postoperative course was uncomplicated, and the neonate was thriving without any evidence of infection or obstruction at 2-month and 6-month follow-up visits.
conclusionThere have been very few cases of omphalocele with a patent vitelline duct reported in the literature, and those that have been described present with either visible mucosal prolapse or intestinal extrusion at birth. This case demonstrates that a vitelline duct anomaly may remain clinically occult and present only with obstructive symptoms such as bilious emesis. In neonates with omphalocele who develop gastrointestinal obstruction despite unrevealing imaging studies, clinicians may entertain the possibility of a concurrent vitelline duct remnant as a part of their differential diagnosis. Recognition of this association may guide operative planning and improve diagnostic awareness of this uncommon embryologic anomaly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.