ArticleContraception and reproductive medicine2026
Trends and determinants of utilization of traditional contraceptive methods among women of reproductive age (WRA) (15-49 years) in Uganda.
Article in Contraception and reproductive medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraditional contraceptive methods (TCM) use is common in areas with limited access to modern options, or in settings where cultural practices discourage the use of modern methods. TCM, including folk methods, rhythm, withdrawal, and lactational amenorrhea method (LAM) beyond six months postpartum, are less effective than modern contraceptive methods. TCM are entrenched as an initial contraceptive method in many settings. We examined the trends and social-demographic factors associated with TCM use among women of reproductive age (WRA) (15-49 years) in Uganda to gain an in-depth understanding of the method-specific determinants of use, and to inform the development of targeted interventions to improve the use of the modern contraceptive method that are more effective than the TCM, and address unmet need for family planning.
methodsA secondary data analysis was performed on multiple cross-sectional datasets obtained from the nationally representative Performance Monitoring for Action (PMA) Surveys conducted between 2017 and 2024. The surveys were based on a multi-stage cluster design, typically using urban-rural and major regions as the strata. Enumeration areas were sampled to create a representative list of households. Data were collected using PMA Collect based on Open Data Kit (ODK), an open-source application with data collection tools designed, programmed and installed on mobile smartphones. We determined the prevalence of and trends in TCM use across the four surveys. Determinants of use were ascertained using the prevalence ratio (PR)_ as a measure of association. PRs, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals and p-values, were obtained using a "modified" Poisson regression model via a generalized linear model with the family as Poisson and a log link. All analyses were weighted and accounted for a multi-stage cluster design achieved via the survey set (svyset) command in STATA software version 18.
resultsOverall, TCM use has significantly increased over the years, from 3.8% in 2017 to 6.7% in 2024 (p-value < 0.0001), and contributed 11.8% and 16.4% of total contraceptive prevalence in 2017 and 2024, respectively. The increase in TCM use has been highest among women with tertiary education (6.6% to 15.3%), followed by secondary education (4.3% to 7.7%) and lowest in none/primary education (3.2% to 4.7%) between 2017 and 2024. TCM use was significantly higher in women with tertiary adjusted prevalence ratio (adj.PR) = 2.36 [1.74-3.22] or secondary education, adj.PR = 1.63[1.38-1.91] relative to those with primary or no education. Similarly, TCM use was twice as high among young (20-24 years) adj.PR = 2.43[1.79-3.29] and older (25-49 years) women, adj.PR = 2.37[1.67-3.34] compared to the adolescents (15-19 years).
conclusionTraditional contraceptive methods use, and its share to the overall contraceptive use have steadily increased over time. Socio-economic-cultural structure of TCM users is increasingly more urban, higher education, and older women, which may be reflective of empowerment. However, there is a need to assess the impact of the increased TCM use on adverse outcomes such as unintended pregnancies, abortions and maternal mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.