Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42231478›Full record

ArticleBiology direct2026

DNA methylation patterns re-establish during clonal expansion restoring cell-to-cell epialleles heterogeneity.

Davide Costabile, Maddalena Russo, Rosa Della Monica, Michela Buonaiuto, Giulia De Riso, Marta Sabbarese, Giuseppe Catapano, Sergio Cocozza, Roberta Visconti, Lorenzo Chiariotti and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology direct, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Davide CostabileCEINGE Advanced Biotechnologies "Franco Salvatore", via G. Salvatore 486, 80145, Naples, Italy.
Maddalena RussoDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnologies, University of Naples "Federico II", Via S. Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Rosa Della MonicaCEINGE Advanced Biotechnologies "Franco Salvatore", via G. Salvatore 486, 80145, Naples, Italy.
Michela BuonaiutoCEINGE Advanced Biotechnologies "Franco Salvatore", via G. Salvatore 486, 80145, Naples, Italy.
Giulia De RisoCEINGE Advanced Biotechnologies "Franco Salvatore", via G. Salvatore 486, 80145, Naples, Italy.
Marta SabbareseCEINGE Advanced Biotechnologies "Franco Salvatore", via G. Salvatore 486, 80145, Naples, Italy.
Giuseppe CatapanoNeurosurgery Unit, "Ospedale del Mare" Hospital, Napoli, Italy.
Sergio CocozzaCEINGE Advanced Biotechnologies "Franco Salvatore", via G. Salvatore 486, 80145, Naples, Italy.
Roberta ViscontiDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Naples "Federico II", Via D. Montesano 49, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Lorenzo ChiariottiCEINGE Advanced Biotechnologies "Franco Salvatore", via G. Salvatore 486, 80145, Naples, Italy. lorenzo.chiariotti@unina.it.
Mariella CuomoCEINGE Advanced Biotechnologies "Franco Salvatore", via G. Salvatore 486, 80145, Naples, Italy. mariella.cuomo@unina.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is still debated whether the combination of methylated and unmethylated CpGs, defined as epialleles, is stably propagated during cell division or whether epiallele diversity can dynamically emerge over time. By analyzing epiallele profiles in putative single-cell-derived clones, we sought to track the behaviour of DNA methylation profiles through cell divisions to determine whether epialleles are faithfully copied from mother to daughter cells, or instead a heterogeneous epiallele population is generated, giving rise to cell-to-cell methylation variability. Our findings revealed that: i) clonal expansion did not result in the maintenance of a single dominant epiallele configuration; ii) expanding clones progressively re-established a broad repertoire of epialleles similar to that observed in the mixed population; iii) although the major epiallele structures were partially preserved, each clone displayed a distinct epiallele distribution characterized by differences in epiallele frequencies relative to the bulk population. Notably, these clone-specific epiallele distributions remained relatively stable as cell numbers increased during proliferation. Overall, our findings suggest that epiallele diversity reemerges during clonal expansion, consistent with the dynamic behavior of DNA methylation at individual CpG sites and cell-to-cell variability in DNA methylation patterns.

Indexed as

AllelesDNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticAnimalsCell DivisionCell ProliferationDNA methylationEpialleleEpigenetic heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID42231478
PMCPMC13471441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.