ArticleBiology direct2026
DNA methylation patterns re-establish during clonal expansion restoring cell-to-cell epialleles heterogeneity.
Article in Biology direct, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is still debated whether the combination of methylated and unmethylated CpGs, defined as epialleles, is stably propagated during cell division or whether epiallele diversity can dynamically emerge over time. By analyzing epiallele profiles in putative single-cell-derived clones, we sought to track the behaviour of DNA methylation profiles through cell divisions to determine whether epialleles are faithfully copied from mother to daughter cells, or instead a heterogeneous epiallele population is generated, giving rise to cell-to-cell methylation variability. Our findings revealed that: i) clonal expansion did not result in the maintenance of a single dominant epiallele configuration; ii) expanding clones progressively re-established a broad repertoire of epialleles similar to that observed in the mixed population; iii) although the major epiallele structures were partially preserved, each clone displayed a distinct epiallele distribution characterized by differences in epiallele frequencies relative to the bulk population. Notably, these clone-specific epiallele distributions remained relatively stable as cell numbers increased during proliferation. Overall, our findings suggest that epiallele diversity reemerges during clonal expansion, consistent with the dynamic behavior of DNA methylation at individual CpG sites and cell-to-cell variability in DNA methylation patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.