Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42231414›Full record

ArticleFluids and barriers of the CNS2026

Induction of subtle blood-brain barrier dysfunction using preclinical diagnostic ultrasound combined with microbubbles.

Shakira A van der Panne, Isabella Z Koster, Anita E Grootemaat, Nicole N van der Wel, Mario G Ries, Helga E de Vries, Louise van der Weerd, Gustav J Strijkers, Erik N T P Bakker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fluids and barriers of the CNS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shakira A van der PanneDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. s.a.vanderpanne@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-6040-8481
Isabella Z KosterDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anita E GrootemaatElectron Microscopy Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4209-8232
Nicole N van der WelElectron Microscopy Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6392-3417
Mario G RiesCenter for Imaging Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Helga E de VriesAmsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7904-7124
Louise van der WeerdDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5997-2125
Gustav J StrijkersDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6700-5058
Erik N T P BakkerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2819-5818

Funding

Alzheimer Nederland WE.30-2022-04ZonMw 10510032120006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe blood-brain barrier (BBB) plays a critical role in maintaining brain homeostasis by tightly regulating molecular transport. However, its integrity is often compromised with aging and in neurodegenerative diseases, contributing to disease pathology. Studying the biological consequences of BBB dysfunction independent of concomitant pathology remains challenging, largely due to the absence of reliable and inducible animal models that avoid unintended side effects such as osmotic effects, neuroinflammation, or vascular damage. In this study, we evaluated the use of Power Doppler ultrasound (PDUS) combined with microbubbles to induce widespread, bilateral BBB opening in the mouse brain.

methodsMice received intravenous infusions of SonoMAC microbubbles during transcranial PDUS application. BBB permeability was assessed via Evans Blue dye extravasation and immunofluorescence analysis of extravasated immunoglobulins. Vessel integrity was evaluated at the ultrastructural level using transmission electron microscopy (TEM).

resultsPDUS combined with microbubbles successfully induced widespread BBB opening, as evidenced by diffuse Evans Blue staining and immunoglobulin extravasation in coronal sections. Immunoglobulin leakage was detected in all analyzed brain regions, with lower levels in white matter, likely reflecting its lower vascular density. Leakage appeared to primarily originate from capillaries while TEM analysis revealed no overt vascular damage.

conclusionsThese findings support PDUS with microbubbles as a non-destructive, reproducible method to model widespread BBB dysfunction. This approach offers an in vivo platform to study BBB-related pathophysiological processes such as impaired clearance, protein aggregation, and neurotoxicity, as well as for investigation of therapeutic delivery to the brain parenchyma.

Indexed as

Blood-Brain BarrierMicrobubblesUltrasonography, Doppler, TranscranialAnimalsCapillary PermeabilityEvans BlueMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLEvans BlueAnimal mouse modelBlood-brain barrierImmunoglobulinLeakageMicrobubblesPower Doppler ultrasoundPreclinical

Identifiers

PMID42231414
PMCPMC13231714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.