ArticleBMC research notes2026
Integrating portable X-Ray fluorescence and personal air sampling into ethnographic field research during agrichemical fumigation in an avocado orchard: field challenges encountered and lessons learned.
Article in BMC research notes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe purpose of this research was to pilot a methodology for integrating portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF), personal air sampling, and ethnographic field notes during an agrichemical fumigation event in a commercial avocado orchard in Michoacán, Mexico. Portable exposure-assessment technologies are increasingly used in field research; however, there remains limited methodological demonstration of how ethnographers can integrate these instruments into real-time observation and analysis.
resultsInstrument outputs were aligned with ethnographic documentation of movement, labor practices, and routine activities during fumigation. This approach revealed short-duration exposure dynamics linked to specific practices across environmental matrices, including airborne particulates and orchard surfaces. The field deployment also revealed substantial workflow and ergonomic constraints, particularly related to time-stamping observations, synchronizing instrument outputs with field notes, and managing cognitive load while operating multiple devices. This study is not intended to offer a comprehensive exposure characterization. Instead, it provides a methodological demonstration based on data from a single fumigation event. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of integrating portable analytical instruments into ethnographic fieldwork while highlighting practical considerations for researchers conducting environmental and occupational exposure assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.