Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42231377›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2026

Workplace gaslighting in nursing practice: a concept analysis.

Hamed Gholizad Gougjehyaran, Hadi Hassankhani, Elnaz Asghari, Hamidreza Haririan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hamed Gholizad GougjehyaranDepartment of Medical-Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Hadi HassankhaniDepartment of Medical-Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Elnaz AsghariDepartment of Medical-Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Hamidreza HaririanDepartment of Medical-Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. houman.haririan@gmail.com.

Funding

Tabriz University of Medical Sciences IR.TBZMED.REC.1404.206
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGaslighting is a subtle and insidious form of psychological abuse in the workplace that operates through the distortion or denial of reality and the induction of cognitive doubt, ultimately undermining individuals' confidence in their perceptions and professional judgment. Although the concept has gained increasing attention in organizational and psychological literature, gaslighting remains theoretically underdeveloped and conceptually ambiguous within nursing practice. It is frequently conflated with related phenomena such as workplace bullying, psychological violence, or incivility, which limits accurate identification, measurement, and intervention. This study aimed to clarify the concept of gaslighting in nursing practice through a systematic concept analysis.

methodsThis study employed Walker and Avant's eight-step concept analysis method. A comprehensive review of English- and Persian-language literature was conducted using databases including PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, SID, and IranDoc. All uses of the concept of gaslighting relevant to nursing and healthcare contexts were examined. Data were analyzed to identify defining attributes, antecedents, consequences, model cases, and empirical referents of gaslighting in nursing practice.

resultsThe analysis revealed that gaslighting in nursing practice is a covert, processual, and power-based phenomenon. Its defining attributes include distortion or denial of reality, induction of cognitive doubt, persistent and patterned behavior, power imbalance, victim blaming, and a subtle, non-confrontational nature. Key antecedents were identified as hierarchical power structures, high workload and stressful clinical environments, and the absence of clear organizational policies and supportive reporting mechanisms. The consequences of gaslighting extend beyond individual psychological harm and include reduced professional self-confidence, burnout, organizational silence, decreased reporting of concerns, diminished quality of care, and potential threats to patient safety. Based on these findings, a conceptual model illustrating the relationships among antecedents, defining attributes, and consequences of gaslighting in nursing practice was developed.

conclusionThis concept analysis provides a clear and structured understanding of gaslighting in nursing practice and differentiates it from other forms of workplace mistreatment. The proposed conceptual framework offers a foundation for future empirical research, development of measurement instruments, and the design of educational and organizational interventions aimed at preventing and addressing gaslighting in nursing environments.

Indexed as

BullyingGaslightingPsychological abuseWorkplace gaslightingWorkplace violence

Identifiers

PMID42231377
PMCPMC13445868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.