ArticleBMC surgery2026
Association between chorda tympani manipulation time and early taste disturbance after primary stapes surgery.
Article in BMC surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the association between intraoperative chorda tympani nerve (CTN) manipulation time and early postoperative taste disturbance after primary stapes surgery.
methodsThis retrospective study included 56 patients who underwent primary stapes surgery. CTN manipulation time was measured objectively using archived surgical video recordings. Early postoperative subjective taste symptoms were assessed at postoperative week 1 using a patient-reported ordinal scale. Patients were grouped according to manipulation duration, and taste outcomes were compared. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the discriminative ability of manipulation time and identify an optimal cutoff value. In addition, logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between CTN manipulation time as a continuous variable and the risk of postoperative taste disturbance. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.
resultsPostoperative taste disturbance occurred in a total of 13 patients (23.2%), including 3 patients (10.7%) in the short manipulation group and 10 patients (35.7%) in the long manipulation group (Fisher's exact test p = 0.041; OR = 4.63). Postoperative taste scores were significantly lower in the long manipulation group, with median scores of 3 (IQR: 2-3) versus 3 (IQR: 3-3) in the short manipulation group (p = 0.021). ROC analysis demonstrated high discriminative performance (AUC = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.80-1.00); however, given the limited number of outcome events, these findings should be interpreted as exploratory and hypothesis-generating. When CTN manipulation time was analyzed as a continuous variable, univariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that longer manipulation time was significantly associated with an increased risk of postoperative taste disturbance (OR = 1.06 per second increase, 95% CI: 1.02-1.11, p = 0.008).
conclusionProlonged CTN manipulation time may be associated with an increased risk of subjective early postoperative taste disturbance after primary stapes surgery and may reflect underlying surgical complexity and intraoperative conditions rather than a direct causal mechanism. However, given the potential influence of perioperative confounders, these findings should not be interpreted as indicating a direct causal relationship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.