ArticleBMC public health2026
Country-specific differences in the association between obesity risk factors in two high-income countries: a cross-sectional analysis from the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough Sweden and Canada are high-income countries with similar social structures, obesity prevalence is significantly higher in Canada. This study explored country-specific differences in the association between socioeconomic and behavioural risk factors for obesity in Sweden and Canada, using data from the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiological (PURE) study.
methodsThis cross-sectional study included 9 790 adults aged 34-60 years from Canada (n = 6 652, 55% women) and Sweden (n = 3 138, 54% women). The Boruta algorithm was used to identify relevant factors that were associated with obesity among individual with normal weight (body mass index [BMI]: 18.5-<25 kg/m
resultsMore Canadians than Swedes had obesity (26 vs. 16%, p-value: <0.001). Ultra-processed food (UPF) and the Alternative Healthy Eating Index (AHEI-2010) score were identified as the main drivers of obesity risk. The highest UPF intake group was strongly associated with obesity in both Canada (OR = 2.31 [CI = 1.57-3.37]) and Sweden (OR = 2.83 [CI = 2.30-3.49]). Canadian men had higher UPF intake and were found to have a significantly higher risk of obesity (p for interaction: 0.032 and 0.021 for middle and highest tertiles), compared to Swedish males. Among women, low socioeconomic status (rural residence (OR = 2.30 [CI = 1.66-3.17] vs. OR = 1.42 [CI = 1.19-1.70]), low income (OR = 4.75 [CI = 2.71-8.95] vs. OR = 2.62 [CI = 2.16-3.18]), not working (OR = 2.24 [CI = 1.51-3.29] vs. OR = 1.32 [CI = 1.07-1.63]), and unskilled occupation (OR = 5.08 [CI = 3.05-8.45] vs. OR = 1.78 [CI = 1.38-2.28]) was more strongly associated with obesity in Sweden than in Canada.
conclusionsThis study highlights important differences in obesity-related risk factors between Sweden and Canada. UPF consumption, the AHEI-2010 score and socioeconomic disadvantage emerged as key drivers of obesity, with notable sex- and country-specific patterns. These findings underscore the importance of tailored, context-specific public health strategies to address obesity in different national settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.