Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42231295›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2026

Obesity simulation suits in health professions education: a scoping review.

Anna C Steinacker, Lukas Bischof, Daniela Herchet, Victoria Kreiss, Michael Klingenberg, Stefan Bösner

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anna C SteinackerDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Applied Sciences Fulda, Leipzigerstr. 123, Fulda, 36037, Germany. anna.steinacker@gw.hs-fulda.de.
Lukas BischofDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Applied Sciences Fulda, Leipzigerstr. 123, Fulda, 36037, Germany.
Daniela HerchetDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Applied Sciences Fulda, Leipzigerstr. 123, Fulda, 36037, Germany.
Victoria KreissDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Applied Sciences Fulda, Leipzigerstr. 123, Fulda, 36037, Germany.
Michael KlingenbergDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Applied Sciences Fulda, Leipzigerstr. 123, Fulda, 36037, Germany.
Stefan BösnerDepartment of General Practice, Philipps University Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Str. 4, Marburg, 35043, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWeight-related stigma toward people living with obesity is widespread in healthcare settings and has been documented among students and professionals across health disciplines. Such stigma may negatively affect communication, clinical decision-making, and quality of care. Educational strategies aimed at addressing weight bias and fostering empathy during the training of health professionals are therefore of growing interest. In recent years, obesity simulation suits have been introduced as experiential learning tools intended to sensitize learners to physical and psychosocial challenges associated with higher body weight.

methodsA scoping review was conducted in accordance with the methodological framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley and further refined by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). A comprehensive search was conducted in November 2025 in CINAHL, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, supplemented by citation tracking, with no restrictions on publication year or language. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened independently by two reviewers. Studies were eligible if they reported on the educational use of obesity simulation suits, including related terms such as bariatric, empathy, or fat suits, as well as weighted vests, within healthcare-related education involving adult learners. Data were charted using a standardized extraction form and synthesized descriptively.

resultsTwelve studies met the inclusion criteria out of 152 identified records. Studies were conducted across multiple countries, including the United States, Germany, and other countries, and involved learners from medicine, nursing, nutrition science, and exercise science. OSS were either worn by learners or by standardized patients. Quantitative outcomes included attitudes toward obesity, beliefs about causation, empathy, cultural humility, and implicit weight bias, assessed using validated questionnaires. Results were mixed, with some studies reporting short-term improvements in specific measures, while others found no significant changes. Qualitative findings described increased awareness of physical effort and mobility limitations, as well as emotional responses such as discomfort.

conclusionsExisting literature on obesity simulation suits in healthcare education is limited and heterogeneous. While OSS may offer opportunities for experiential learning, there is currently no consistent evidence of sustained improvements in attitudes or empathy toward people with obesity relating to OSS. Further research is needed to clarify how OSS can be integrated thoughtfully into educational programs.

Indexed as

Health OccupationsHealth PersonnelObesitySimulation TrainingEmpathyHumansPatient SimulationProblem-Based LearningWeight PrejudiceEmpathy educationHealthcare educationObesitySimulation suit

Identifiers

PMID42231295
PMCPMC13231796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.