ArticleBMC public health2026
Disability-related care trajectories in a pluralistic health system: a qualitative study in urban Sierra Leone.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeople living with disabilities (PLWD) often require long-term and repeated engagement with healthcare services. In pluralistic health systems, where biomedical, traditional, spiritual and NGO-based services coexist, care seeking is rarely linear and is shaped by multiple social, cultural and structural factors. Little is known about how disability-related care trajectories unfold over time and which factors shape access at different stages.
methodsThis qualitative study is based on six focus group discussions (N = 42) with PLWD and caregivers of children living with disabilities, conducted in urban Freetown. Care trajectories were reconstructed from participants' accounts and differentiated between early care seeking at symptom onset and long-term care. Qualitative content analysis was conducted, conceptualising access as shaped by people's abilities to perceive care options, seek, reach, afford and engage with care.
resultsEarly care seeking was characterised by frequent movement between care domains, particularly biomedical, traditional and spiritual care, driven by uncertainty, trial-and-error processes and dissatisfaction with outcomes. Long-term care trajectories tended to focus on biomedical and NGO-based services, while traditional care was largely abandoned. Adult PLWD often disengaged from long-term care altogether. Access to biomedical care was shaped by substantial barriers, including physical inaccessibility, transport difficulties, informal payments, and experiences of discrimination. NGO services were perceived as more accessible, especially for long-term care yet were often unknown during early care seeking. DISCUSSION: The findings illustrate how disability-related care seeking in a pluralistic health system is dynamic and shaped by evolving interpretations of disability, prior care experiences and structural constraints. A central tension emerged: biomedical care was perceived as more reliable for diagnosis, yet associated with the highest access barriers. NGO-based services, while experienced as more accessible, remained largely unknown during early care seeking.
conclusionImproving access to disability-related care in pluralistic health systems requires attention to the full range of care domains that people navigate and to the structural and relational barriers shaping access over time. Strengthening accessible, respectful and coordinated care within public health systems, and increasing the visibility of NGO-based services at earlier stages of care seeking, are essential to support sustained engagement for PLWD and their families.
trial registrationN/A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.