Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42231279›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2026

A biologically informed framework for instrument selection in dietary Mendelian randomization using chemosensory genetics.

Liang-Dar Hwang, Cailu Lin, David M Evans, Nicholas G Martin, Danielle R Reed, Paule V Joseph

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Liang-Dar HwangInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. d.hwang@uq.edu.au.
Cailu LinMonell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
David M EvansInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Nicholas G MartinQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Danielle R ReedMonell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA. reed@monell.org.
Paule V JosephSection of Sensory Science and Metabolism (SenSMet), National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism & National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. paule.joseph@nih.gov.

Funding

Australian Research Council DE240100014National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia 2017942National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, United States Z01AA000135Wellcome Trust MR/Z505924/1Wellcome Trust and MRC 102215/2/13/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMendelian randomization (MR) is increasingly used to strengthen causal inference in nutritional epidemiology. However, dietary MR studies often rely on instruments selected from genome-wide association studies of self-reported intake based solely on statistical significance, increasing vulnerability to pleiotropy and reverse causation and potentially violating key MR assumptions. We aimed to develop and evaluate a biologically informed framework for selecting valid genetic instruments for dietary exposures, leveraging genes encoding taste and olfactory receptors that influence chemosensory perception and shape food preferences and dietary behaviour.

methodsWe prioritised 1,214 nonsynonymous variants (minor allele frequency ≥ 1%) across 30 taste and 295 olfactory receptor genes. Associations with 140 food-liking traits were tested in UK Biobank participants aged 37 to 73 years. Candidate variants were evaluated using a multi-stage filtering pipeline comprising replication in an independent younger cohort (Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, age 25), concordance between food liking and intake, exclusion of associations with socioeconomic status, assessment of food specificity accounting for linkage disequilibrium and co-consumption, and directionality testing to reduce reverse causation. Retained variants were used as instruments in MR analyses of cardiometabolic outcomes.

resultsWe identified 268 variants within 101 olfactory and 16 taste receptor genes associated with 96 food-liking traits. Filtering yielded 24 candidate instruments for 20 foods. The instrument for onion liking satisfied all pre-defined criteria for classification as high confidence. As an illustrative MR application, genetically proxied onion liking was associated with lower systolic and diastolic blood pressure and reduced risk of type 2 diabetes, with no evidence of effects on body mass index, glycaemic traits, or serum lipid levels.

conclusionsInstrument selection guided by chemosensory genetics provides a scalable strategy for dietary MR that can improve instrument credibility and reduce susceptibility to pleiotropy and reverse causation. However, this approach prioritises biological specificity at the cost of fewer available instruments. This framework supports more robust causal evaluation of diet-disease relationships and strengthens inference in nutritional epidemiology and public health research.

Indexed as

DietFood PreferencesMendelian Randomization AnalysisReceptors, OdorantTasteAdultAgedFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolymorphism, Single NucleotideUnited KingdomReceptors, OdorantALSPACBlood pressureDietary exposureFood likingMendelian randomizationOlfactory receptorTaste receptorType 2 diabetesUK Biobank

Identifiers

PMID42231279
PMCPMC13273952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.