ArticleBMC public health2026
Assessment of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) of living surroundings and school environment among adolescent high school students in Northwest Ethiopia: mixed method study.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSchool-based WASH programs in low- and middle-income countries showed significant impacts on health, nutrition and education. Poor WASH practices contributed to malnutrition, anemia, infections, and gender inequities, particularly among adolescents. Inadequate facilities, sociocultural and economic disparities are key challenges. This study aimed to assess the availability, quality, accessibility and practice of WASH in the living surroundings and school environments among adolescent high school students in the study area. METHODOLOGY: This study employed a convergent explanatory mixed-method design across four high schools in Machakel district among high school students during the 2022/2023 academic year. Purposive sampling technique was applied for qualitative data collection including thirty-three key informants and six focus group discussions. Using proportional random sampling technique, 410 students were sampled and surveyed. Data collection utilized surveys, interviews, focus groups, and school WASH observations. WASH was categorized as "good" or "poor" based on mean scores of adolescent WASH. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression. Qualitative findings were triangulated for a comprehensive understanding of adolescent WASH. Determinant factors were identified through multi-variable binary logistic regression (p < 0.05).
resultAdolescent high school students in the district faced poor water access (70.2%) and inadequate sanitation (74.9%). Nearly 90% rely on untreated water sources, whereas 21.2% of students rely on passive water treatment techniques. Most handwashing stations were dysfunctional and lacked soap, undermining hygiene practices. Poor WASH, experienced by over 70% of students, was compounded by water shortages, inadequate infrastructure, and cultural norms limiting hygiene practices. School location and living arrangements are determinants of WASH of adolescent students. Students from Shelel high school had higher odds of having a favorable WASH compared with those from Amanuel high school. The adjusted odds ratio (AOR) was 2.15 (95% CI: 1.03-4.48, p = 0.041). Living arrangement was also independently associated with adolescent WASH. Students living with their family had significantly higher odds of favorable WASH compared with those living alone, with an AOR of 2.58 (95% CI: 1.30-5.11, p = 0.006).
conclusionThe study in the district revealed critical gaps in WASH among high school students, posing serious health and educational challenges. Water accessibility is inadequate with poor treatment practice. Female students faced gender-specific issues, including poor menstrual hygiene facilities. Socioeconomic disparities amplify these problems, particularly for those students living alone away from family. Integrated and contextualized WASH improvements are needed to address these issues and enhance students' health and overall well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.