Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42231256›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2026

Perceived feasibility of group EMDR therapy among disaster-affected adolescents in Turkey: a convergent mixed-methods study.

Gulsen Filazoglu Cokluk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Gulsen Filazoglu CoklukDepartment of Psychology, Toros University, Mersin, 33140, Türkei. gulsen.filazoglu@toros.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7431-282X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdolescents exposed to natural disasters often develop post-traumatic stress disorder. Despite interest in group-based trauma therapies, the feasibility of the Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing Integrative Group Treatment Protocol among disaster-affected adolescents remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate how symptom severity and psychological resilience influence adolescents' perceptions of the feasibility of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing Integrative Group Treatment Protocol. It also sought to identify key barriers and facilitators affecting adolescents' willingness to participate in such interventions following natural disasters.

methodsA total of 120 adolescents aged 13 to 18 years from earthquake- and flood-affected regions participated in a convergent mixed-methods study using stratified purposive sampling to ensure diversity in gender, exposure severity, and location. Participants completed the Revised Child Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Scale, the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, and a 15-item Feasibility Questionnaire for Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing Integrative Group Treatment Protocol. Quantitative data were analyzed using bivariate correlations and linear regression. Qualitative responses to open-ended questions about perceived barriers and facilitators were analyzed using thematic content analysis.

resultsAdolescents with higher levels of post-traumatic stress reported lower feasibility scores (r = -0.47, p < 0.01), while those with higher resilience perceived the intervention as more acceptable (r = 0.35, p < 0.01). Significant differences were found in feasibility and resilience based on PTSD severity groups (p = 0.005 and p = 0.036, respectively). Key barriers included emotional dysregulation, confidentiality concerns, and scheduling difficulties. Facilitators included peer support and the presence of structured preparatory guidance.

conclusionsPerceived feasibility of group-based Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing is shaped by trauma severity and resilience. Psychoeducational preparation, logistical flexibility, and attention to emotional safety are essential to support adolescent engagement in post-disaster mental health interventions.

trial registrationThis study was not prospectively registered, as it does not constitute a clinical trial. It was conducted as an observational, non-interventional mixed-methods feasibility study assessing adolescents' pre-intervention perceptions of group-based EMDR therapy. No therapeutic outcomes were evaluated, and no participants were assigned to treatment conditions. In accordance with Turkish regulations, observational studies involving human participants require ethical approval but are not subject to mandatory trial registration. Ethical approval was obtained from the Toros University Ethics Committee.

Indexed as

DisastersEye Movement Desensitization ReprocessingNatural DisastersPsychotherapy, GroupStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticAdolescentFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleResilience, PsychologicalTurkeyAdolescentsEye movement desensitization and reprocessingFeasibilityGroup therapyNatural disastersResilienceTrauma

Identifiers

PMID42231256
PMCPMC13543534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.