ArticleBMC oral health2026
Development and validation of risk prediction algorithms based on cone beam computed tomography and intraoral scanning fusion data to estimate whether biological width is at a low value: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBiological width (BW) safeguards the periodontal ligament and alveolar bone. A reduced BW value may lead to periodontal complications. This study aims to develop and validate digital risk prediction algorithms to assess whether BW is low in adults with good oral hygiene.
methodsFour thousand four hundred twenty sites of 740 teeth from 55 adults with good oral hygiene were used for model development and validation. A mixed-effects logistic regression model was used to derive a risk prediction equation for low BW, incorporating CBCT, intraoral scanning (IOS), and periodontal probing data. Predictors included tooth type, tooth site, gingival margin (GM)-cementum-enamel junction (CEJ) distance, CEJ-alveolar ridge crest (ARC) distance, and gingival thickness (GT). The outcome measure was the classification of BW as low if it was less than 1.13 mm, an operational threshold. Sulcus depth (SD) was measured clinically. GM-CEJ, GT, and D (the distance between GM and ARC) were measured digitally. BW was calculated by subtracting D and SD.
resultsThe raw prediction model is represented by the equation logit(P-raw) = 8.40-2.17*GM-CEJ - 2.25*CEJ-ARC + βSite + βTooth+ (1 | PatientID), where P-raw denotes the probability of low BW. The re-calibration model is logit(P-cal) = 0.1028-0.7159* logit(P-raw). The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.165, indicating that 16.5% of the individual variation was attributable to the patient level. The raw model with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.867 indicates good discrimination. The calibration curve suggested good internal calibration. The external feasibility test of the model yielded an AUC of 0.68, demonstrating moderate discrimination. The external feasibility test of the recalibration model indicated acceptable calibration. The model's visual nomogram enables individual site risk calculation for low BW.
conclusionThe developed and validated risk prediction models, based on CBCT and IOS data fusion, may assist to estimate low BW. The inclusion of predictors such as GM-CEJ, CEJ-ARC, tooth site, and tooth type assists clinicians in identifying high-risk tooth sites, thereby facilitating detection of periodontal tissue damage. Future research could develop linear regression models to solve limitations, including the definition of the cutoff and the limited external validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.