ArticleBMC public health2026
Insights into middle-aged men (40-70) who died by suicide: a nationwide mixed methods study in the Netherlands.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGlobally, middle-aged men dominate suicide statistics in many regions. To understand their heightened vulnerability, we examine the interplay between sociodemographic factors, contextualized through psychosocial perspectives.
methodsData from Statistics Netherlands of all middle-aged men (40-70) who died by suicide between 2012 and 2021 (N = 6,656) and interview data from a psychosocial autopsy study of suicide decedents (n = 25) were combined. We applied a machine learning method on the population data to detect subgroups of middle-aged men with a higher risk of dying by suicide. To distil factors and nuances beyond sociodemographic categorization, we executed a thematic analysis on the interview data from the psychosocial autopsy study.
resultsOn average the suicide rate for middle-aged men in the Netherlands was 21.3 per 100,000. The suicide rate was high (> 40 suicides per 100,000) for middle-aged men who received mental health care (114), received a disability benefit (55.9), lived alone (51.6), received social assistance (50.6), had somatic health care costs over €10,000 per year (49), or between €5,000 and €10,000 per year (43), or had a low household income (40.8). However, it became evident that suicide rates were significantly higher when these factors accumulated, with the combination of (i) received mental health care, (ii) lived alone, and (iii) received a disability benefit resulting in 289.1 suicides per 100,000. The thematic analysis contextualized sociodemographic risk factors by providing insight into underlying themes, including the experience of loss, disconnectedness, and debilitation.
conclusionsThe data indicate that the accumulation of (mental) health, socioeconomic, and interpersonal hardships, carry significant risk for middle-aged men. The interaction of factors underscores the complexity of the origin of suicide, while also pointing to avenues for prevention efforts. Suicide prevention efforts must be integrated into the systems and contexts where middle-aged men are currently situated, which include clinical care, community settings, and social services. Future research should explore the support needs of middle-aged men with lived experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.