Observational studyBMC geriatrics2026
Factors associated with the engagement in meaningful activity and occupational balance in institutionalised older adults: a prospective observational cohort study.
Observational study in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOlder adults living in institutional settings often face barriers to maintaining engagement in meaningful activities, which may compromise occupational balance, autonomy and overall well-being. Although a wide range of activity programmes is typically offered, the factors influencing meaningful engagement and occupational balance in these environments remain poorly understood.
methodsAn observational one-year cohort study was conducted across four nursing homes and day centres in Andalusia (Spain). A total of 144 institutionalised older adults were assessed at baseline and at 12-month follow-up. Engagement in meaningful activities was measured using the Engagement in Meaningful Activities Survey (EMAS). Occupational balance was assessed using the Spanish version of the Occupational Balance Questionnaire (OBQ-E). Functional status was assessed with the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) with frailty being assessed through the Fried's criteria. Participation in daily living, cognitive, leisure, physical and sensory and community activities was recorded. Paired t-tests, simple linear regressions and hierarchical linear regression models were used to examine change over time and predictors of the two main outcomes.
resultsFunctional status, frailty and cognitive engagement appear to be key determinants of meaningful participation and occupational balance in. The predominance of highly structured leisure activities within current institutional programmes may limit opportunities for meaningful engagement. These findings highlight the potential value of co-designed, person-centred activity programmes better aligned with interests, values, and functional abilities of the institutionalised older adults to support more meaningful ageing in institutional settings.
conclusionsThese findings underscore the need to review the type and range of activities offered in institutional settings, reducing time devoted to highly structured leisure activities and promoting more enriching experiences. To do so, experience-based co-design approaches involving institutionalised older adults and professionals in these settings are essential to develop person-centred programmes to enhance engagement in meaningful activities and occupational balance. Future research should include controlled designs and mixed methods to better capture the complex interplay between health status, contextual factors and activity engagement in institutionalised settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.