ArticleBMC public health2026
Expanding the reach of pre-exposure prophylaxis services in suburban and rural Ontario: an implementation science evaluation of a public health-led model.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite the proven efficacy of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in preventing HIV, disparities among service delivery prevail in Canada, particularly among suburban and rural regions. This study evaluates the reach and effectiveness of a mixed-service delivery PrEP clinic embedded within a public health unit, located in Southeastern Ontario.
methodsThe PrEP clinic possesses an interdisciplinary team that delivers in-person and remote services. In consultation with PrEP clinic staff, we used the RE-AIM Framework to describe client characteristics (reach) and evaluate implementation effectiveness across the continuum of care, leveraging client electronic medical records.
resultsBetween 2018 and 2024, 141 clients engaged in PrEP services, the majority of whom were cisgender men (97.2%) with a median age of 37 years. Of those assessed, 70% (n = 98) initiated PrEP. Initiation was more likely among clients living outside the catchment area (RR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.11-1.64), those with a history of hepatitis B (RR = 1.45, 95% CI: 1.30-1.62), and those reporting a history of having an HIV-positive partner (RR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.18-1.49). The median duration of engagement was 8 months (IQR: 3-21 months), with no new HIV diagnoses reported. Overall, 54.1% of clients disengaged (n = 53), with the highest rates occurring within the first 3 months and after 12 months. Common reasons for disengagement included transferring care (24.5%), moving (18.9%), and changes in sexual activity (16.98%).
conclusionThis evaluation demonstrates that mixed-service public-health led PrEP delivery models can effectively engage clients in suburban and rural settings. Findings support the scalability of flexible, public health led approaches to expanding equitable access to PrEP in Canada.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.