ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2026
Recognizing red flags in genetic cardiomyopathy: the importance of genetic testing.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite the known genetic pathogenic variants involved in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), clinical practice often considers genetic testing as a secondary step rather than a diagnostic priority. In this report, we present a series of cases from our experience in Lebanon where the aggressive nature of specific genotypes, particularly Lamin A/C (LMNA) pathogenic genetic variants, was initially masked by the standard heart failure management.
methodsThe patients' medical records were reviewed for clinical presentation, disease progression and complications, as well as relevant diagnostic studies and genetic findings. The genetic analysis of the patients was performed through a comprehensive next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based multigene cardiac panel. CASES PRESENTATION: We describe the clinical presentations of three patients with genetic cardiomyopathies who rapidly progressed from conduction system diseases to life-threatening arrhythmias, a trajectory that might have been altered by earlier genetic identification.
conclusionThese cases highlight the importance of identifying "red flags" for genetic cardiomyopathies in the early disease stages. By sharing these findings, we aim to show that performing genetic evaluation early in the diagnostic process is a clinical necessity rather than a classification task since it is essential for managing patients and screening families to prevent avoidable mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.