ArticleThe oncologist2026
How can integration of oncology and palliative care services be achieved for optimal patient benefit? Stakeholders' perspectives in Zimbabwe.
Article in The oncologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCancer is a main driver of death and serious health-related suffering. The growing body of evidence for early integration of palliative care alongside oncological treatment to optimizes patient-reported outcomes is almost exclusively from high-income countries, while the greatest need is in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We aimed to explore the perspectives of patients, families and clinical staff on what constitutes a feasible, acceptable and appropriate model of integrated palliative and oncology care in Zimbabwe. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted an exploratory qualitative study underpinned by indicators for integrated oncology and palliative care. Participants comprised healthcare professionals, patients, and families. Semistructured guides were developed and iteratively refined. Deductive framework analysis was conducted to Hui's evidence-based framework of integrated oncology and palliative care indicators. The data were then further inductively coded into the framework.
resultsAnalysis of data from 45 stakeholders (n = 15 per group) identified 19 of 38 indicators (50%) aligned with Hui's model, indicating partial and uneven integration. Alignment was strongest in clinical processes (n = 9) and education (n = 5), with more limited support for administration (n = 3) and structure (n = 2). No findings aligned with the research domain. Inductive coding identified 3 indicators that aligned with clinical processes (routine discussion of prognosis, advance care planning and goals), clinical structure (physical environment) and education (training needs). DISCUSSION: While the Hui model is broadly applicable, substantial contextual adaptation is required. Integration cannot be achieved through coordination alone and requires system-level investment in workforce, training, infrastructure, and policy. We propose a phased "minimum package" for integration tailored to Zimbabwe and similar LMIC settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.