ArticleAnatomical sciences education2026
Students' perspectives on the use of social media in anatomy medical education: A survey study.
Article in Anatomical sciences education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medical students are increasingly engaging with digital technologies for anatomy learning. However, investigations of students' perceptions of anatomy social media content are lacking. This study aims to explore medical students' perspectives of anatomy social media content and its self-reported value as a learning resource. A cross-sectional study was conducted to survey first-year medical students enrolled in Gross Anatomy. An online survey instrument was developed for this study and administered via Qualtrics. The 12-item survey collected information on demographics, general social media use, and perspectives on anatomy social media content. Of 171 students, 139 (81% response rate) completed the survey, and 124 (124/139, 89%) who actively used social media were included in subsequent analyses. Most participants spent at least 60 min per day on social media (66/124, 53%), with Instagram and TikTok being the most used platforms. These platforms were also identified as the primary sources of anatomy-related content (Instagram: 55/124, 44%; TikTok: 40/124, 32%). The majority (64/98, 65%) indicated they always or most of the time read or watch anatomy content on social media without further engagement (p < 0.001). Medical students engage with anatomy content on social media primarily through passive, incidental exposure rather than intentional learning strategies. Instagram and TikTok serve as the primary platforms for content exposure. While students reported interest in this content, these findings reflect subjective perceptions rather than objective learning outcomes. This exploratory study provides a foundation for future work evaluating the role of social media in anatomy medical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.