ArticleNature ecology & evolution2026
Ninety-year trends reveal sharpest insect declines in the mid-twentieth century.
Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cinderella Biodiversity: Three Decades of Monitoring Reveal Earlier Emergence and Increasing Abundance in Undervalued and Sparsely Recorded Flying Insects and Ballooning Spiders.Global change biology · 2026Article
- Historical and contemporary butterfly genomes reveal genetic erosion in response to land-use intensification.iScience · 2026Article
- European challenges.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most studies on insect trends have focused on the past few decades, but major changes could have occurred earlier. If so, shifted baselines can result in misleading conclusions or poor conservation decisions. Here we analyse nine decades of insect trends in Switzerland and relate them to changes in land use and climate. By reconstructing continuous trends in species richness based on 1.2 million records of 595 saproxylic beetle and 216 butterfly species, we find that both groups declined from the 1930s to the 1960s. While saproxylic beetle richness stabilized and subsequently recovered, butterfly richness continued to decline until the 1980s and has not recovered. The strong mid-century decreases were linked to increases in agricultural mechanization, while the subsequent increases were linked to climate warming. Over the entire 90-year period, declines primarily affected specialist and cold-adapted species, while warm-adapted species have increased since the 1980s. Recent gains in saproxylic beetle richness might also reflect increased deadwood availability from windthrow and 'biodiversity-friendly' forest management. Our findings suggest that reducing adverse land use is key to maintaining and promoting insect diversity, and that shifted baselines and climate-change effects should be considered when setting restoration goals and priorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.