ArticleScientific reports2026
Semi-automated detection of cleaning interactions using supervised machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cleaner fish engage in mutualistic interactions by removing ectoparasites from client species, a behaviour that has traditionally been quantified through labour-intensive manual video analysis. This method is not only time-consuming but also susceptible to human error and bias. In this study, we developed a semi-automated system to track and classify cleaning interactions between the cleaner wrasse (Labroides dimidiatus) and the powder blue tang (Acanthurus leucosternon) in a controlled three-dimensional laboratory setting. We employed DeepLabCut (DLC), a deep learning-based tool for markerless pose estimation, to track both fish species simultaneously. The resulting model reliably tracked both individuals with low error rates. Using the tracking data, we designed a classification algorithm that detected cleaning interactions with 90% accuracy. Although the algorithm misclassified approximately 15% of non-interactions as interactions, it successfully identified 25% of video content as containing interactions, thereby reducing the amount of footage requiring manual annotation by 75%. This approach significantly decreases human labour while maintaining high classification performance. Overall, our system represents a valuable step toward automating behavioural analysis in marine mutualisms and can serve as a foundation for broader applications in ethology and conservation research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.